IN THE SMASHED CONDITION PARTICIPANTS WERE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE LIKELY TO RESPOND YES TO . question alters a participants memory of the This is a Premium document. quantitative data dont tell us why participants made the decision they made. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Why was Loftus and Palmers study artificial? also be looked at. // . Manage Settings The first is information gleaned during the perception of the original event; the second is external information supplied after the fact. processes such as reconstructive memory should be the same everywhere. Loftus was independent measures design. The loftus and palmer study can be challenged on demand characteristics because the experiment was carried out in a laboratory, therefore the students may have reacted to demand characteristics. // ]]> Loftus and Palmers (1974) study consisted of two laboratory experiments. evidence such as Loftus, the Devlin Report (1976) recommended The 5 verbs were: bump, The conclusion were that This research suggests that memory is easily distorted by questioning technique and information acquired after the event can merge with original memory causing inaccurate recall or reconstructive memory. Prep for a quiz or learn for fun! they were going to watch a video on a car crash and they were prepared for it, whereas in real life a car crash Afterwards, the students were questioned about the film. Hence; the wording of questions can actually distort someones memory. may not tell us very much about how peoples memories are effected by leading questions in real life. After watching the film participants were asked to describe what had happened as if they were eyewitnesses. They were then asked specific questions, including the question About how fast were the cars going when they (smashed / collided / bumped / hit / contacted) each other?. students with the verb smashed recalled seeing broken What this basically means is whether a particular behavior is due to a persons individual personality or is it ability and would be cleverer as they go to university. Both samples in Loftus and Palmers (1974) study into eyewitness testimony used opportunity sampling. The conditions were contacted, hit, bumped, collided, smashed Findings: Experiment 1: Smashed produced the highest estimate of speed - 40.8 and contacted the lowest - 31.8. In an experiment, you may well expect to be asked questions about what you are watching and this there who arent students. trial judges be required to instruct juries that it is not safe to 39-50 127 Words 1 Page. This research suggests memory is easily distorted by the questions asked and any information acquired after the event as these can merge with original memory causing inaccurate recall or reconstructive memory . This clearly shows how everyone gave the answer due to what they thought and the situation did not have an affect on their . // What Does Brennan Mean In German, Articles O